Skip to main content

United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipe Fitting Industry of the United States and Canada, AFL-CIO, Local 188 Pension Fund v. Johnson Controls, Inc.

S.D. Ga.May 20, 2022No. 4:18-cv-00182
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment
State
Georgia

Related Laws

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

Court denied defendant's motion for summary judgment on the main ERISA/LMRA claims regarding delinquent contributions for travel and standby time, allowing the case to proceed. Court granted defendant's supplemental motion for summary judgment on plaintiff's request for injunctive relief under Section 301 of the LMRA.

What This Ruling Means

**Pension Fund vs. Johnson Controls: What Workers Need to Know** This case involved a dispute between a plumbers' union pension fund and Johnson Controls, Inc., a large building systems company. The Local 188 Pension Fund, which manages retirement benefits for plumbing and pipe fitting workers, filed a lawsuit against Johnson Controls claiming the company violated ERISA (Employee Retirement Income Security Act) rules related to pension obligations. ERISA is the federal law that protects workers' retirement and health benefits by setting standards for how employers must handle these plans. When companies don't follow ERISA requirements—such as failing to make required pension contributions or properly manage fund assets—unions and pension funds can take legal action. While the specific outcome of this case isn't detailed in the available information, the lawsuit represents the ongoing efforts by worker organizations to hold employers accountable for their pension responsibilities. **What This Means for Workers:** This case highlights the importance of union pension funds actively monitoring and enforcing employers' obligations to worker retirement benefits. When companies fail to meet their pension commitments, legal action can help protect workers' hard-earned retirement security. Workers should stay informed about their pension fund's health and any disputes with contributing employers.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.