Skip to main content

Arriwite v. SME Steel Contractors, Inc.

D. IdahoJuly 22, 2022No. 4:18-cv-00543
Mixed ResultSME Steel Contractors, Inc.$80,000 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
710 Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
jury verdict
State
Idaho

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wrongful TerminationBreach of Contract

Outcome

Jury found SME Steel Contractors did not wrongfully discharge plaintiff in violation of public policy, but did breach the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, awarding $80,000 in damages. Court denied employer's renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law.

What This Ruling Means

Arriwite v. SME Steel Contractors, Inc.

What Happened

Arriwite worked for SME Steel Contractors and was terminated from their job. The employee sued the company, claiming wrongful termination and breach of contract. These claims challenge whether the employer fired the worker unfairly or violated agreements made between them.

What the Court Decided

A jury found that SME Steel Contractors did not wrongfully fire Arriwite. However, the court determined the company *did* break the implied promise of fair dealing that exists in all employment relationships. The jury awarded Arriwite $80,000 in damages as compensation. The judge rejected the employer's request to overturn this decision.

Why This Matters for Workers

This case shows that even when an employer has the right to fire someone, they must still treat employees fairly and honestly throughout the process. Companies cannot act in bad faith or treat workers unfairly, even during termination. Workers who believe they've been treated dishonestly—even if they weren't technically fired illegally—may have grounds to recover money damages. This provides an important protection beyond traditional wrongful termination claims.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

More Rulings in This Case

Other orders and opinions in Arriwite from the same court.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.