Skip to main content

Employers and Illinois Operative Plasterers and Cement Masons Local 18 Annuity Fund v. H. F. Fritsch & Sons, Inc.

C.D. Ill.July 29, 2021No. 3:19-cv-03125
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The court granted the plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment, finding the defendant liable for unpaid fringe benefit contributions, liquidated damages, and attorneys' fees. The specific dollar amounts are to be determined through a later accounting and payroll audit.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened:** The Employers and Illinois Operative Plasterers and Cement Masons Local 18 Annuity Fund sued H. F. Fritsch & Sons, Inc., claiming the construction company failed to make required payments into workers' retirement benefit plans. These payments are typically required under union contracts or federal law when employers have agreed to contribute to employee pension and annuity funds. The fund alleged that Fritsch violated ERISA (the Employee Retirement Income Security Act), which protects workers' retirement benefits. **What the Court Decided:** The court outcome is not specified in the available information, so the final resolution of this case is unclear. **Why This Matters for Workers:** This type of case highlights an important protection for workers in unionized industries, particularly construction. When employers agree to contribute to employee benefit funds—whether through union contracts or other agreements—they are legally required to follow through. ERISA gives workers and their benefit funds the right to sue employers who don't make these contributions. This ensures that workers don't lose out on retirement benefits they've earned, even if their employer tries to skip payments.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.