Skip to main content

Throgmorton v. Reynolds

C.D. Ill.October 25, 2022No. 3:12-cv-03087
Mixed ResultDumbaugh & Childers, P.C.$752,000 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
440 Civil Rights: Other
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

Jury awarded plaintiff $700,000 for emotional distress and $52,000 for economic loss in legal malpractice case. On appeal, court affirmed emotional distress damages (reduced to $5,000 by remittitur) and reversed on defendants' cross-appeal regarding recoverability of emotional distress damages in legal malpractice claims.

What This Ruling Means

**Employment Dispute at Law Firm Results in Mixed Victory** This case involved a dispute between an employee and the law firm Dumbaugh & Childers, P.C. The employee, Throgmorton, sued the firm claiming they broke their contract and provided poor legal services that caused both financial harm and emotional distress. A jury initially awarded Throgmorton $752,000 total - $700,000 for emotional distress and $52,000 for economic losses. However, the case went through appeals that changed the final outcome significantly. The court upheld the right to collect emotional distress damages in legal malpractice cases, but dramatically reduced the emotional distress award from $700,000 to just $5,000. The economic damages of $52,000 were maintained. **What this means for workers:** This case shows that employees can potentially recover both financial losses and emotional distress damages when suing their employers for legal malpractice or contract violations. However, courts may significantly reduce large emotional distress awards if they seem excessive. Workers should understand that while emotional distress claims are possible, the amounts awarded may be much smaller than initially granted by juries. The case also demonstrates that employment disputes can go through multiple rounds of appeals, potentially changing the final outcome.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.