Skip to main content

Fox Valley & Vicinity Construction Workers Welfare Fund v. Morales

N.D. Ill.January 17, 2019No. 1:17-cv-00416
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
791 Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage TheftBreach of Contract

Outcome

Court granted summary judgment in part for the Funds on delinquent contributions owed by Bravo Construction ($176,495.35 plus liquidated damages and audit fees), but denied summary judgment as to personal liability of Louis Morales for contributions attributable to Morales Services employees, finding genuine factual disputes regarding whether certain employees performed bargaining unit work requiring fringe benefit contributions.

What This Ruling Means

**Fox Valley Construction Workers Fund vs. Morales: Court Dismisses ERISA Case** This case involved a dispute between the Fox Valley & Vicinity Construction Workers Welfare Fund and a person named Morales. The welfare fund, which provides benefits like health insurance and retirement contributions to construction workers, filed a lawsuit claiming Morales violated ERISA laws. ERISA is the federal law that protects worker benefit plans and requires employers to make proper contributions to employee welfare funds. The court dismissed the case entirely, meaning the welfare fund's claims were thrown out. The ruling provides limited details about why the case was dismissed or what specific violations were alleged. **What This Means for Workers:** This case highlights how welfare funds actively pursue employers who may not be meeting their obligations to worker benefit plans. Even though this particular case was dismissed, it shows that benefit funds have legal tools to go after employers who don't pay required contributions. For construction workers and others in industries with welfare funds, this demonstrates that there are organizations working to protect their benefits. Workers should stay informed about their benefit entitlements and report any concerns about missing contributions to their union representatives or fund administrators.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.