Skip to main content

Central Laborers' Pension Fund v. E. A. Masonry, Inc.

S.D. Ill.March 18, 2020No. 3:18-cv-01485
Plaintiff WinE. A. Masonry, Inc.$9,746.33 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
default judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

Default judgment entered against E. A. Masonry, Inc. for failure to respond to complaint alleging ERISA violations. Plaintiff pension fund awarded $9,746.33 in unpaid contributions, liquidated damages, audit costs, litigation costs, and attorney fees.

What This Ruling Means

**What the Case Was About:** The Central Laborers' Pension Fund sued E.A. Masonry, Inc. for violating ERISA (Employee Retirement Income Security Act) rules. ERISA is a federal law that protects workers' pension and benefit plans. The pension fund claimed that E.A. Masonry failed to meet its obligations under this law, likely related to making required contributions to workers' pension benefits or properly managing employee benefit funds. **What the Court Decided:** The court dismissed the case in March 2020. This means the court threw out the lawsuit without ruling in favor of either side. Court records don't specify the exact reason for dismissal, but this could have happened for various procedural reasons, such as the case being settled out of court, filed incorrectly, or lacking sufficient evidence to proceed. **Why This Matters for Workers:** This case highlights the importance of ERISA protections for employee benefits and pensions. Even though this particular lawsuit was dismissed, it shows that pension funds actively monitor whether employers are following the rules. Workers should know that there are legal mechanisms in place to protect their retirement benefits, and organizations exist to enforce these protections when employers don't comply with federal benefit laws.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.