Skip to main content

Bricklayers Union Indiana Pension Fund Trustees of the v. Best Brickwashing, LLC

INNDMarch 22, 2021No. 2:19-cv-00219
Plaintiff WinBest Brickwashing, LLC$7,530.15 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
default judgment
State
Indiana

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The court granted the plaintiffs' motion for default judgment against Best Brickwashing, LLC for failure to appear or defend after proper service. The defendant was ordered to pay $7,530.15 in unpaid pension and welfare fund contributions, liquidated damages, interest, audit costs, and attorneys' fees.

What This Ruling Means

**Union Pension Fund Wins Against Company That Failed to Pay Required Contributions** This case involved a dispute between the Bricklayers Union Indiana Pension Fund and Best Brickwashing, LLC, a company that apparently failed to make required pension and welfare fund contributions for its workers. Union pension funds typically require employers who have collective bargaining agreements to contribute a certain amount per hour worked or per employee to fund retirement and health benefits. The court ruled in favor of the union pension fund trustees and ordered Best Brickwashing to pay $7,530.15. This amount included unpaid pension contributions, additional penalty damages, interest, costs for auditing the company's records, and attorneys' fees. The company lost by "default judgment," which means they either didn't respond to the lawsuit or failed to appear in court to defend themselves. **What This Means for Workers:** This ruling shows that courts will enforce employers' obligations to contribute to union pension and welfare funds. When companies sign collective bargaining agreements, they must follow through on their promises to fund worker benefits. Workers covered by union contracts can expect legal protection when employers try to skip these required contributions, helping ensure their retirement and health benefits remain funded.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.