Skip to main content

Hampton v. Bakery, Confectionary & Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers International Union of America, Local 218, AFL-CIO

D. Kan.October 22, 2021No. 2:21-cv-02010
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
442 Civil Rights: Jobs
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss
State
Kansas

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationBreach of Contract

Outcome

Union's motion to dismiss granted for both breach of duty of fair representation and racial discrimination claims. Court found Hampton failed to adequately plead facts showing the Union acted arbitrarily, discriminatorily, or in bad faith, or that the employer violated the collective bargaining agreement.

What This Ruling Means

**Hampton v. Bakery Workers Union: Discrimination Case Against Labor Union** This case involved a worker named Hampton who filed discrimination claims against their labor union, Local 218 of the Bakery, Confectionary & Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers International Union. Hampton alleged that the union discriminated against them, though the specific details of the discrimination claims are not available in the court records provided. The court's final decision in this case is not known based on the available information. The case was filed in Kansas federal court in October 2021, but the outcome and any damages awarded have not been reported. **What This Means for Workers:** This case highlights an important point for union members: labor unions themselves can be held legally accountable for discrimination, just like employers. Workers have the right to file discrimination complaints not only against their employers but also against their own unions if they believe they've been treated unfairly based on protected characteristics like race, gender, age, or disability. Union members who feel their union has discriminated against them in representation, job referrals, or other union activities should know they have legal options available to seek justice.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.