Skip to main content

Swartzel v. Johnson County Community College

D. Kan.January 25, 2022No. 2:21-cv-02090
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss
State
Kansas

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationRetaliationFailure to AccommodateHostile Work EnvironmentWrongful Termination

Outcome

The court granted defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings in part, dismissing plaintiff's ADAAA and KAAD disability discrimination and retaliation claims for failure to exhaust administrative remedies within the statutory period, while allowing certain FMLA and retaliation claims to proceed.

What This Ruling Means

**Swartzel v. Johnson County Community College - Employment Discrimination Case** This case involved a worker who claimed that Johnson County Community College discriminated against them because of a disability. The employee filed a lawsuit alleging that the college violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which is a federal law that protects workers with disabilities from discrimination in the workplace. The case was filed in federal court in Kansas in January 2022. However, the court records available don't show how this case was ultimately resolved - whether it went to trial, was settled out of court, or was dismissed. **Why This Matters for Workers:** This case highlights important protections that exist for employees with disabilities. The ADA requires employers to provide reasonable accommodations for workers with disabilities and prohibits discrimination based on disability status. When workers believe their rights have been violated, they can file lawsuits in federal court to seek justice. Even though we don't know the outcome of this specific case, it demonstrates that employees have legal options when they face disability discrimination. Workers who believe they've experienced similar treatment should know that federal law protects them and that they may have grounds to challenge unfair treatment in court.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.