Skip to main content

Peck v. Air Evac EMS, Inc.

E.D. Ky.January 21, 2020No. 5:18-cv-00615
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
790 Labor: Other
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wrongful Termination

Outcome

The Illinois Supreme Court reversed the appellate court's decision that had reinstated a $150,000 jury verdict for the plaintiff. The Court held that the plaintiff, who requested and was granted a new trial, cannot subsequently challenge that ruling as error, and the verdict from the second trial (in favor of defendants) was reinstated.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** An employee sued their former employer, claiming they were wrongfully fired, maliciously prosecuted, and subjected to intentional emotional distress. Initially, a jury awarded the worker $150,000 in damages. However, the employee wasn't satisfied with some aspect of the first trial and requested a new trial, which the court granted. In the second trial, the jury ruled in favor of the employer instead, awarding no money to the employee. **What the Court Decided** The Illinois Supreme Court sided with the employer. The court ruled that since the employee had asked for and received a new trial after winning the first one, they couldn't later complain that granting the new trial was a mistake. The court essentially said "you can't have it both ways" - the employee chose to roll the dice again and lost. **What This Means for Workers** This case serves as an important warning for workers who win employment lawsuits. If you're unhappy with certain aspects of your trial victory, think very carefully before requesting a new trial. Once you ask for and receive a do-over, you're stuck with whatever happens in the second trial, even if the outcome is much worse than your original win.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.