Skip to main content

Greenberg v. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana University and Agricultural and Mechanical College

E.D. La.June 15, 2020No. 2:19-cv-00137
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
442 Civil Rights: Jobs
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

RetaliationHostile Work EnvironmentDiscrimination

Outcome

This is a procedural order denying plaintiff Greenberg's motion to amend his witness list to include three additional witnesses (Hilton, Theriot, and Comeaux) in his Title VII retaliation and hostile work environment case against LSU Board. The case involves alleged discrimination in Greenberg's termination from an Emergency Medicine Residency Program.

What This Ruling Means

**What happened:** A worker named Greenberg filed a discrimination lawsuit against the Board of Supervisors of Louisiana University and Agricultural and Mechanical College. Greenberg claimed the university discriminated against them in their employment. The specific details of what type of discrimination occurred or how it affected Greenberg's job are not provided in the available case information. **What the court decided:** The court dismissed Greenberg's case entirely. This means the court threw out the lawsuit without awarding any money or other remedies to Greenberg. No damages were reported, indicating Greenberg received no compensation for their claims. **Why this matters for workers:** This case serves as a reminder that filing a discrimination lawsuit doesn't guarantee success, even when workers believe they've been treated unfairly. Courts can dismiss cases for various reasons - perhaps the evidence wasn't strong enough, legal deadlines weren't met, or proper procedures weren't followed. For workers considering discrimination claims, this highlights the importance of documenting workplace issues thoroughly, following company complaint procedures when possible, and potentially consulting with employment attorneys who can help navigate the complex legal requirements needed to build a strong case.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

More Rulings in This Case

Other orders and opinions in Greenberg from the same court.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.