Skip to main content

Trevillion v. Union Pacific Railroad Co

W.D. La.May 4, 2021No. 2:18-cv-00610
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationRetaliationFailure to Accommodate

Outcome

Union Pacific Railroad's motion for summary judgment was granted and the action was dismissed with prejudice. The court found that plaintiff failed to establish a disability discrimination or retaliation claim under the ADA because the employer's decision to keep plaintiff off work was based on legitimate safety concerns related to prohibited medications, not disability discrimination.

What This Ruling Means

**Trevillion v. Union Pacific Railroad Co. - Court Ruling Summary** **What Happened:** An employee named Trevillion sued Union Pacific Railroad Company, claiming the company discriminated against them because of a disability and failed to provide reasonable accommodations that would allow them to do their job effectively. **What the Court Decided:** The court dismissed Trevillion's case, meaning the lawsuit was thrown out and Trevillion did not win. No damages were awarded, and the case ended in favor of Union Pacific Railroad. **Why This Matters for Workers:** This case serves as a reminder that winning disability discrimination and accommodation lawsuits can be challenging. Workers with disabilities have legal rights under federal law to request reasonable accommodations from their employers, but they must be able to prove their case with strong evidence. When filing such claims, employees need to document their disability, show they requested accommodations, and demonstrate that their employer failed to engage in the required process or provide reasonable solutions. Workers facing similar situations should consider consulting with employment attorneys early and keeping detailed records of all communications with their employers about disability-related needs.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.