Skip to main content

Bennett v. McDermott International Inc

W.D. La.September 27, 2021No. 2:19-cv-00158
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
710 Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The court granted defendants' motions to dismiss plaintiffs' FLSA minimum wage and overtime claims. The court found that plaintiffs failed to plead plausible off-the-clock work claims and that under the Fifth Circuit's precedent and the Portal-to-Portal Act, commute time and mandatory safety meetings were not compensable work activities.

What This Ruling Means

Bennett v. McDermott International Inc

What Happened

Employees sued McDermott International Inc claiming the company violated federal wage laws by not paying them for certain work activities. Specifically, the workers claimed they should have been paid for commute time to job sites and time spent in mandatory safety meetings.

The Court's Decision

The court dismissed the case in favor of the company. The judge ruled that commute time and safety meetings are not considered compensable work activities under federal law. The court applied established legal standards that say travel to a workplace and required meetings don't count as "working time" that must be paid.

Why This Matters

This case reinforces an important principle: employers generally don't have to pay workers for commuting to work locations or attending mandatory safety training. However, workers should know that rules can differ depending on the situation. For example, if workers perform job duties during commute time or if travel is part of their actual job, those situations might be different. Workers facing wage issues should understand what activities employers must pay for versus what they don't.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

More Rulings in This Case

Other orders and opinions in Bennett from the same court.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.