Lay v. Local Union 689 of the Amalgamated Transit Union AFL-CIO
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- motion to dismiss
- State
- Maryland
- Circuit
- Fourth Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The court granted Local Union 689's motion to dismiss because Lay's hybrid claim under Section 301 of the LMRA was time-barred under the six-month statute of limitations, and he failed to adequately plead equitable tolling.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.