Escobar v. SteeleSoft Management, LLC
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- summary judgment
- State
- Maryland
- Circuit
- Fourth Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The court granted plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, finding that the employer failed to pay earned wages and overtime compensation in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Maryland wage laws. The court awarded plaintiff $65,095.15 in damages, liquidated damages, and attorney's fees.
What This Ruling Means
Escobar v. SteeleSoft Management, LLC
What Happened
Escobar sued SteeleSoft Management, LLC over unpaid wages and overtime pay. The worker claimed the company failed to pay all the money he had earned, violating both federal and Maryland state wage laws.
What the Court Decided
The court sided with Escobar. A judge determined that SteeleSoft Management had not paid the worker's earned wages and overtime compensation as required by law. The company was ordered to pay Escobar $65,095.15. This amount included the unpaid wages, additional penalties (called liquidated damages), and the worker's legal fees.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case reinforces that employers must pay workers for all hours worked, including overtime. Companies cannot simply withhold earned wages. When employers break these rules, courts can require them to pay not just the missing wages, but also extra damages and attorney costs. This ruling serves as a reminder to workers that they have legal protections against wage theft and can take action if their employer fails to pay them fairly.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.