Garcia Garcia v. Bhav Gosal, Inc.
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- consent decree
- State
- Maryland
- Circuit
- Fourth Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The parties reached a settlement agreement for unpaid wages and overtime under the FLSA. Plaintiff received $5,911.67 in compensatory damages plus attorneys' fees in a wage-and-hour dispute.
What This Ruling Means
Garcia Garcia v. Bhav Gosal, Inc.
What Happened
Garcia Garcia filed a legal case against Bhav Gosal, Inc., claiming the company failed to pay required wages and overtime compensation. This type of dispute, known as wage theft, occurs when employers don't pay workers the full amount they've earned.
What the Court Decided
Rather than going to trial, both sides agreed to settle the case. The company paid Garcia Garcia $5,911.67 in damages to cover the unpaid wages owed. Additionally, the employer had to cover Garcia Garcia's attorney's fees for pursuing the case.
Why This Matters for Workers
This settlement demonstrates that workers have legal protections under federal wage laws requiring employers to pay all earned wages and overtime. When companies fail to do so, workers can take legal action and recover the money owed—plus attorney costs. Even without a full trial, workers who document unpaid wages may resolve disputes and receive compensation. If you believe your employer hasn't paid you fairly, this case shows the legal system can help recover what you've earned.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.