Skip to main content

Yearick v. Kimball Construction Co., Inc.

D. Md.February 2, 2024No. 1:23-cv-02540
Plaintiff WinKye's Inc.$750 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Civil Rights: Other
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The appellate court reversed summary judgment for the defendant and entered summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff, finding that the defendant breached its contract by refusing to allow the plaintiff's chosen disc jockey service (Sounds Unlimited) to perform at her wedding reception, as the contract made disc jockey services a material term of the bargain.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** An employee had a contract that included disc jockey services for her wedding reception as part of the agreement. When the time came, the employer (defendant) refused to allow her chosen DJ service, Sounds Unlimited, to perform at the wedding reception as originally agreed upon in their contract. **What the Court Decided** The appellate court ruled in favor of the employee, awarding her $750 in damages. The court found that the employer broke the contract by refusing to honor the disc jockey services provision. The judges determined that having DJ services was an important part of the original agreement, not just a minor detail that could be ignored. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case shows that employers must honor all parts of their contracts with employees, even provisions that might seem less important than wages or job duties. When contracts include specific benefits or services—whether for weddings, events, or other purposes—employers cannot simply decide to ignore those terms later. Workers can take legal action and recover damages when employers fail to deliver on their contractual promises, regardless of how small the monetary value might seem.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.