Skip to main content

Estate of DaMon R. Fisher v. City of Annapolis

D. Md.March 27, 2024No. 1:21-cv-01074
Plaintiff WinOsler Institute, Inc.$4,507.6 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Civil Rights: Accomodations
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal
State
Indiana

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The appellate court affirmed judgment for the plaintiff employee, finding she was not an exempt administrative employee under the FLSA and was entitled to overtime pay, vacation pay, liquidated damages, and attorney fees totaling $4,507.60.

What This Ruling Means

**Estate of DaMon R. Fisher v. City of Annapolis** This case involved a dispute between the estate of DaMon R. Fisher and the City of Annapolis over alleged civil rights violations and failure to provide workplace accommodations. Fisher had apparently worked for the city before his death, and his estate brought claims suggesting the city violated his civil rights and failed to properly accommodate his needs as an employee. The court dismissed the case entirely, meaning Fisher's estate did not win any money or other relief. The court did not award any damages to the estate. While the specific reasons for dismissal aren't detailed in the available information, this means the court found the claims were not legally sufficient to proceed or that the estate could not prove the city violated Fisher's rights. **What this means for workers:** This case highlights the importance of documenting workplace discrimination and accommodation requests while you're still employed. It also shows that civil rights and accommodation claims can be challenging to pursue, especially after an employee's death. Workers should keep detailed records of any discrimination they experience and formally request accommodations in writing to strengthen potential legal claims.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.