Skip to main content

CAREY v. AB CAR RENTAL SERVICES INC

D. Me.February 8, 2021No. 1:20-cv-00117
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Civil Rights: Jobs
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The court reinstated count II of the second amended complaint stating a tort cause of action under Moorman, but required the plaintiff to amend the complaint to clearly state that contract and tort theories are alternatives to avoid duplicate recovery.

What This Ruling Means

**Carey v. AB Car Rental Services Inc: Contract Dispute Ruling** This case involved a dispute between an employee named Carey and AB Car Rental Services Inc over a broken employment contract. The specific details of what AB Car Rental allegedly did wrong aren't clear from the available information, but Carey claimed the company violated their employment agreement. The court made a mixed decision. A judge named Justice Webber allowed part of Carey's lawsuit to move forward, specifically a claim that fell under "tort" law (which covers wrongful actions that cause harm). However, the judge set a condition: Carey must clarify that they are pursuing either a contract claim OR a tort claim - not both at the same time. This means Carey can continue the case but must choose which legal approach to take. This matters for workers because it shows courts will allow employment cases to proceed even when the legal claims need refinement. It demonstrates that employees have multiple ways to challenge workplace wrongdoing - through contract law (when agreements are broken) or tort law (when harmful actions occur). However, workers and their lawyers must be clear about which legal theory they're using to avoid confusion in court.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.