Skip to main content

CANTRELL v. BRUNSWICK MAINE POLICE

D. Me.April 29, 2024No. 2:23-cv-00283
Defendant WinHoly Cross Hospital
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
440 Civil Rights: Other
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal
State
Maine

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The Illinois Supreme Court affirmed dismissal of the plaintiffs' medical malpractice actions as barred by the four-year statutory repose period, holding that actions filed more than four years after the effective date of the repose provision are untimely regardless of when the plaintiff discovered the injury.

What This Ruling Means

**What happened:** This case involved a dispute between an employee named Cantrell and the Brunswick Maine Police Department over an alleged breach of contract. The specific details of the contract violation aren't provided, but the case appears to center on whether the employer failed to meet their contractual obligations to the employee. **What the court decided:** The court ruled in favor of the employer (Brunswick Maine Police Department), finding against Cantrell. No monetary damages were awarded to the employee. The court determined that whatever contract breach was alleged, it either didn't occur or wasn't significant enough to warrant compensation. **Why this matters for workers:** This case highlights the importance of having clear, well-documented employment contracts and understanding what remedies are available when disputes arise. When employees believe their employer has violated their contract terms, they face the burden of proving both that a breach occurred and that they suffered damages as a result. Workers should carefully review their employment agreements, document any potential violations, and understand that winning breach of contract cases against employers can be challenging. Having detailed records of the employer's obligations and any failures to meet them is crucial for building a strong case.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.