Skip to main content

Local 513, International Union of Operating Engineers, AFL-CIO v. Edwards-Kamadulski, L.L.C.

E.D. Mo.April 29, 2020No. 4:19-cv-03227
Plaintiff WinEdwards-Kamadulski, L.L.C.$49,356.49 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
default judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The court granted plaintiffs' motion for partial default judgment against Edwards-Kamadulski, L.L.C., entering judgment for $49,356.49 in unpaid employee benefit fund contributions, liquidated damages, and attorneys' fees. The court also ordered the defendant to provide an accounting of all requested documents.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** Local 513 of the International Union of Operating Engineers filed a lawsuit against Edwards-Kamadulski, L.L.C., a construction company. The union claimed the company violated ERISA (Employee Retirement Income Security Act) rules, which are federal laws that protect worker pension and benefit plans. The dispute centered on whether the company was properly following the requirements for employee retirement or health benefit plans. **What the Court Decided** The court's final decision in this case is not available in the public records, so the outcome remains unknown. The case was filed in federal court in Missouri in April 2020, but without access to the final ruling, it's unclear whether the union won or lost their claims against the company. **Why This Matters for Workers** This type of case is important because ERISA protects workers' retirement savings and health benefits. When companies don't follow ERISA rules, workers can lose promised benefits or have their retirement funds mismanaged. Union enforcement of these laws helps ensure that all workers receive the benefits they've earned. Even though this specific outcome is unknown, such cases demonstrate how unions actively fight to protect worker benefits through the court system.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.