Skip to main content

Local 513 International Union of Operating Engineers, AFL-CIO v. James Martin Excavating Inc.

E.D. Mo.September 2, 2020No. 4:20-cv-00499
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
791 Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
default judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of ContractWage Theft

Outcome

Court granted plaintiffs' motion for partial default judgment against James Martin Excavating Inc. and its principals for failure to pay employee benefit funds, remit dues, and make trust fund contributions under a collective bargaining agreement. Defendants are ordered to provide an accounting of all records from May 1, 2014 to present.

What This Ruling Means

**Union Fights Excavating Company Over Employee Benefits** This case involved a dispute between Local 513 International Union of Operating Engineers and James Martin Excavating Inc. over employee benefits. The union claimed the excavating company violated ERISA, a federal law that protects workers' retirement plans, health insurance, and other employee benefits. The union argued that the company failed to properly handle these benefits as required by law. The court records show this case was filed in September 2020, but the final outcome and court decision are not available in the public records. No monetary damages were reported in the available information. **What This Means for Workers:** This case highlights how unions actively work to protect workers' benefits when employers may not be following federal benefit laws properly. ERISA violations can affect workers' access to their earned benefits like pensions, health insurance, or retirement funds. When companies don't follow ERISA rules, it can leave employees without the benefits they've earned or paid into. Union involvement in these disputes shows how collective bargaining organizations serve as watchdogs, ensuring employers meet their legal obligations to provide and manage worker benefits correctly.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.