Skip to main content

Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund v. Terra-Scape Landscape Constructors, LLC

E.D. Mo.November 12, 2020No. 4:18-cv-01282
Plaintiff WinTerra-Scape Landscape Constructors, LLC$34,281.12 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The court granted plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment, awarding $34,281.12 in unpaid fringe benefit contributions, liquidated damages, interest, audit costs, and attorney's fees against the defendant employer for breach of collective bargaining agreement obligations.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened:** This case involved a dispute between the Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund and Terra-Scape Landscape Constructors, a landscaping company. The welfare fund claimed that Terra-Scape failed to make required contributions to employee benefit plans. These contributions typically fund health insurance, retirement benefits, and other worker benefits that employers are obligated to pay under union agreements or federal law. **What the Court Decided:** The court outcome is not specified in the available information, so the final ruling remains unclear from this record. **Why This Matters for Workers:** This type of case is important because it involves ERISA (Employee Retirement Income Security Act), a federal law that protects worker benefits. When employers fail to contribute to welfare funds, workers can lose access to healthcare, retirement savings, and other crucial benefits they've earned. These funds are typically managed by unions or trustees on behalf of workers. If employers don't pay their required contributions, the welfare fund may take legal action to recover the money owed to protect workers' benefits. This case demonstrates the legal mechanisms that exist to ensure workers receive the benefits they're entitled to receive.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.