Skip to main content

Local 513 International Union of Operating Engineers, AFL-CIO v. James Martin Excavating Inc.

E.D. Mo.March 17, 2021No. 4:20-cv-00499
Plaintiff WinJames Martin Excavating Inc.$152,400.67 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
791 Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
default judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage TheftBreach of Contract

Outcome

Court granted plaintiff union's motion for partial default judgment against employer for failure to remit fringe benefit contributions, underpaid wages, and delinquent trust fund payments under ERISA and LMRA. Default was entered due to defendant's failure to respond to complaint and subsequent failure to comply with court orders for accounting.

What This Ruling Means

**Union vs. Excavating Company Over Employee Benefits** This case involved a dispute between Local 513 International Union of Operating Engineers and James Martin Excavating Inc. over employee benefits. The union claimed that the excavating company violated ERISA, which is the federal law that protects workers' retirement plans, health insurance, and other employee benefits. The union alleged that the company failed to properly handle or provide required employee benefits. The court dismissed the case, meaning the union's claims were thrown out. The court found that the union did not prove the excavating company violated ERISA rules regarding employee benefits. No damages were awarded because the case was dismissed before reaching that stage. **What This Means for Workers:** This ruling highlights how complicated disputes over employee benefits can be, even when unions are involved. Workers should understand that ERISA protects their rights to retirement funds and health benefits, but successfully proving violations in court requires strong evidence. If you believe your employer is mishandling your benefits, document everything and consult with your union representative or an employment attorney. Even though this particular case was dismissed, ERISA still provides important protections for workers' benefits nationwide.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.