Skip to main content

Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund v. CMT Roofing, LLC

E.D. Mo.September 25, 2023No. 4:22-cv-00047
Plaintiff WinCMT Roofing, LLC$727,571.19 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

Court granted plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment in part, awarding the union and benefit funds $727,571.19 in unpaid ERISA contributions, liquidated damages, interest, and fees. Defendant employer CMT Roofing failed to make required contributions to multiemployer pension and welfare funds under collective bargaining agreements.

What This Ruling Means

**What This Case Was About** A construction workers' welfare fund sued CMT Roofing, LLC for violating ERISA (Employee Retirement Income Security Act). The welfare fund claimed the roofing company failed to make required contributions to employee benefit plans, which typically include health insurance, pension, or other worker benefits that unionized construction workers are entitled to receive. **What the Court Decided** The court dismissed the case against CMT Roofing. This means the lawsuit was thrown out, and the welfare fund did not win any money or other relief from the roofing company. The court did not award any damages to the fund. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case highlights the ongoing challenges workers face when employers don't pay into benefit funds as required. Even when welfare funds try to enforce these obligations through the courts, they don't always succeed. For construction workers, this emphasizes the importance of understanding what benefits they're entitled to and ensuring their employers are actually making the required contributions. Workers should stay informed about their benefit plans and report any concerns about missing contributions to their union representatives or benefit fund administrators.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.