Skip to main content

Albelo v. Epic Landscape Productions, L.C.

W.D. Mo.June 29, 2021No. 4:17-cv-00454
Plaintiff WinK.F.C. National Management Corporation$9,999 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wrongful Termination

Outcome

Employee won on service letter violation claim; jury awarded $1 actual damages and $10,000 punitive damages (reduced to $9,999). Appellate court affirmed, rejecting employer's arguments that punitive damages were improper and that the service letter statute was unconstitutional.

What This Ruling Means

**Albelo v. Epic Landscape Productions: FLSA Wage Claim Dismissed** This case involved a worker named Albelo who sued their employer, Epic Landscape Productions, claiming violations of federal wage and hour laws. Albelo alleged that the landscaping company failed to follow the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which sets rules for minimum wage, overtime pay, and other workplace pay standards. The specific details of what wage violations Albelo claimed are not provided in the available information. The court dismissed Albelo's case, meaning the lawsuit was thrown out without a ruling in the worker's favor. No damages were awarded to Albelo. The court filing doesn't specify the reasons for dismissal, which could range from procedural issues to insufficient evidence supporting the wage violation claims. **What This Means for Workers:** This case highlights the challenges workers face when pursuing wage and hour claims under the FLSA. Even when workers believe their rights have been violated, successfully proving violations in court can be difficult. Workers considering FLSA claims should carefully document their hours, pay records, and working conditions. It's also important to understand that not all dismissed cases mean the worker's claims were without merit—sometimes cases are dismissed for technical or procedural reasons rather than the substance of the complaint.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.