Adams v. Buckeye Fire Equipment Company
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- summary judgment
- State
- North Carolina
- Circuit
- Fourth Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The court granted the defendant's summary judgment motion, finding that the plaintiff was not an eligible employee under the FMLA because he had not been employed for 12 months when he requested leave, and thus could not establish FMLA interference or retaliation claims.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.