Skip to main content

Boyle v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

D. Neb.October 22, 2020No. 8:18-cv-00363
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Federal Employer's Liability
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wrongful Termination

Outcome

The court granted Union Pacific's motion for summary judgment, excluding the plaintiff's expert testimony on causation and exposure under Daubert standards, thereby dismissing the wrongful death claim brought under FELA.

What This Ruling Means

**Railroad Worker Files Safety Claim Against Union Pacific** This case involved a worker named Boyle who filed a lawsuit against Union Pacific Railroad Company under the Federal Employer's Liability Act (FELA). FELA is a special law that protects railroad workers who get injured on the job due to their employer's negligence or unsafe working conditions. The lawsuit was filed in federal court in October 2020. Unfortunately, the specific details of what happened to Boyle and how the case was resolved are not available in the court records. What we do know is that this was a FELA claim, which typically means the worker believed Union Pacific was at fault for an injury or unsafe situation at work. **Why This Matters for Workers:** This case highlights an important protection for railroad employees. Unlike most workers who are covered by workers' compensation, railroad workers can sue their employers directly under FELA if they're injured due to company negligence. This federal law allows railroad workers to potentially recover damages for medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering. However, workers must prove their employer was at least partially at fault for their injury, which can be more challenging than standard workers' compensation claims.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.