Skip to main content

Friedly v. Union Bank and Trust Company

D. Neb.November 19, 2021No. 4:21-cv-03105
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
710 Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

Court granted plaintiff's motion for conditional certification of a collective action under the FLSA, allowing notice to be sent to potential class members regarding failure to include bonuses in overtime pay calculations. The case is at an early procedural stage pending discovery and ultimate merits determination.

What This Ruling Means

**Friedly v. Union Bank and Trust Company: Wage Theft Claim Dismissed** This case involved an employee named Friedly who sued Union Bank and Trust Company for wage theft. Friedly claimed the bank failed to pay wages that were legally owed, which could include unpaid overtime, withheld final paychecks, or other compensation the employee believed they were entitled to receive. The court dismissed Friedly's case, meaning the judge ruled in favor of the bank without awarding any money to the employee. The court found that Friedly did not prove their wage theft claims against Union Bank and Trust Company. No damages were awarded to the worker. **What This Means for Workers:** This case shows that winning a wage theft lawsuit requires strong evidence to prove that an employer actually violated wage laws. Simply claiming unpaid wages isn't enough - workers must demonstrate exactly what they're owed and why. If you believe your employer has stolen wages, it's important to keep detailed records of your hours worked, pay stubs, and any communication about compensation. While this particular case was unsuccessful, workers still have the right to pursue legitimate wage theft claims when they have proper documentation and evidence.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

More Rulings in This Case

Other orders and opinions in Friedly from the same court.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.