Skip to main content

Friedly v. Union Bank and Trust Company

D. Neb.July 25, 2022No. 4:21-cv-03105
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
710 Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
consent decree

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

Court approved the parties' joint stipulation for dismissal with prejudice based on a settlement agreement where plaintiffs received 100% of calculated FLSA damages for failure to include bonuses in regular rate calculations plus equal liquidated damages.

What This Ruling Means

**Court Dismisses Bank Employee's Wage Theft Claim** This case involved a dispute between an employee named Friedly and Union Bank and Trust Company over unpaid wages. Friedly claimed the bank failed to properly pay wages they were owed, which is commonly known as wage theft. The employee filed a lawsuit seeking compensation for these allegedly unpaid wages. The court dismissed Friedly's case in July 2022, meaning the employee lost and received no money from the bank. The court did not award any damages to the worker. While the specific details of why the case was dismissed are not provided in the available information, dismissals in wage cases often occur when employees cannot prove their claims with sufficient evidence or when technical legal requirements are not met. **What This Means for Workers:** This case highlights the challenges employees face when pursuing wage theft claims. Workers considering similar lawsuits should carefully document their hours, pay stubs, and any communications about wages. It's important to understand that winning wage theft cases requires strong evidence showing exactly what wages were unpaid and why the employer owes them. Workers should also be aware of strict deadlines for filing wage claims and may benefit from consulting with employment attorneys before proceeding.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.