TRUSTEES OF THE NEW JERSEY B.A.C. HEALTH FUND v. DORAN TATROW ASSOCIATES, INC.
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- default judgment
- State
- New Jersey
- Circuit
- Third Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
Default judgment entered in favor of plaintiff benefit fund trustees against employer for failure to remit ERISA multiemployer plan contributions and union dues check-offs totaling $69,528.36.
What This Ruling Means
Court Rules in Favor of Benefit Fund Against Employer
What Happened
The New Jersey B.A.C. Health Fund (a union benefit plan) sued Doran Tatrow Associates, Inc. for failing to pay required contributions and union dues. Employers are legally required to collect money from workers' paychecks for these benefits and forward the funds to the union plan. Doran Tatrow did not do this, owing approximately $69,528.36.
What the Court Decided
The court ruled completely in favor of the benefit fund. Because the employer failed to respond to the lawsuit, the judge entered a default judgment, meaning the court automatically decided against the employer. The company must pay the full $69,528.36 in damages.
Why This Matters for Workers
This ruling reinforces that employers cannot ignore their legal duty to collect and pay union benefits and dues. Workers depend on these contributions for health insurance, pensions, and other benefits. When employers skip these payments, workers lose promised coverage. This case shows courts will hold employers financially accountable for breaking these obligations.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.