Skip to main content

PLUMBERS LOCAL UNION NO. 24 PENSION FUND v. GRACE PLUMBING & HEATING, LLC

D.N.J.April 21, 2021No. 3:20-cv-15492
Plaintiff WinGrace Plumbing & Heating, LLC$254,484.88 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
default judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

Default judgment granted in favor of Plumbers Local Union No. 24 Pension Fund and related entities against Grace Plumbing & Heating, LLC for failure to respond to complaint alleging breach of collective bargaining agreement and failure to make required ERISA contributions.

What This Ruling Means

**Pension Fund Wins Against Employer Who Failed to Pay Required Benefits** This case involved Grace Plumbing & Heating, LLC, a company that failed to make required payments to employee pension and benefit funds as promised in their union contract. The Plumbers Local Union No. 24 Pension Fund sued the company for breaking their collective bargaining agreement by not contributing money that was supposed to go toward workers' retirement and benefit plans. The court ruled entirely in favor of the pension fund because Grace Plumbing & Heating never responded to the lawsuit or defended themselves in court. This resulted in a "default judgment" - essentially an automatic win for the union. The company was ordered to pay $254,484.88 in damages to cover the missing contributions and related costs. This ruling matters for unionized workers because it shows courts will enforce employers' obligations to contribute to pension and benefit funds. When companies sign union contracts promising to pay into these funds, they cannot simply ignore those commitments. Workers rely on these employer contributions for their retirement security and healthcare benefits. The substantial financial penalty sends a message that employers who skip these payments will face serious legal consequences, helping protect workers' hard-earned benefits.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.