Skip to main content

NEW JERSEY BUILDING LABORERS' STATEWIDE PENSION FUND AND TRUSTEES THEREOF v. LANGHAN DEVELOPMENT LLC

D.N.J.May 17, 2022No. 2:20-cv-09329
Plaintiff WinLangan Development LLC$522,949.75 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
default judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

Court granted in part and denied in part plaintiff's motion for default judgment against Langan Development LLC, a successor to River Drive Construction Co., for unpaid withdrawal liability and breach of settlement agreement.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** The New Jersey Building Laborers' Statewide Pension Fund sued Langhan Development LLC over pension fund violations. The pension fund claimed that Langhan Development, a construction company, violated federal pension laws known as ERISA (Employee Retirement Income Security Act). This type of case typically involves employers who fail to make required pension contributions for their workers or don't follow proper pension fund rules. **What the Court Decided** The court outcome is not available from the provided information, so it's unclear how this case was resolved. The case was filed in May 2022 and involved ERISA violations, but the final decision hasn't been reported. **What This Means for Workers** This case highlights the ongoing legal battles over worker pension rights. ERISA laws exist to protect workers' retirement benefits and ensure employers contribute what they owe to pension funds. When companies don't meet their pension obligations, union pension funds often take legal action to recover missing contributions. For workers in unionized construction jobs, these cases demonstrate that their pension funds actively fight to protect their retirement security, even when it means taking employers to court.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.