Skip to main content

Robinson v. Universal Health Services Inc

D. Nev.July 20, 2021No. 2:19-cv-01530
Defendant WinUniversal Health Services Inc$18.75 at issue
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Civil Rights: Jobs
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal
State
Nevada

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The court held that the default in payment canceled the note and insurance, but directed a verdict for $18.75 to cover the difference between long-term and short-term rates plus attorney's fees.

What This Ruling Means

**Robinson v. Universal Health Services Inc - Court Ruling Summary** This case involved a dispute between an employee named Robinson and Universal Health Services Inc, a healthcare company, over an insurance payment issue. The details suggest the conflict centered on a payment obligation related to an insurance note, where Universal Health Services had failed to make required payments. The court made a significant decision that favored the employer. A trial judge had initially awarded Robinson $18.75, but a higher court reversed this decision. The appeals court ruled that because Universal Health Services missed the first payment on the insurance agreement, this failure automatically canceled the entire insurance contract. This meant the company was no longer legally required to make any payments under that agreement. However, the court sent the case back to the lower court to examine other legal defenses that Universal Health Services had raised, meaning the matter isn't completely resolved. **What this means for workers:** This ruling shows how strict payment deadlines in employment-related insurance agreements can work against employees. When employers miss initial payments, it might void their entire obligation to provide promised benefits, potentially leaving workers without expected coverage or compensation.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.