Skip to main content

Board of Trustees of the Construction Industry and Laborers Joint Pension Trust v. John Jory, LLC

D. Nev.April 22, 2024No. 2:23-cv-00782
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
default judgment
State
Nevada

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

Default judgment entered in favor of Plaintiffs (Board of Trustees pension funds) against Defendants John Jory, LLC, John Jory Corporation, and Johnson & Jory Properties, LLC for failure to respond to withdrawal liability assessment and pay assessed pension withdrawal liability of $969,278.

What This Ruling Means

**Court Case Summary: Pension Fund vs. Construction Company** This case involved a dispute between a construction workers' pension fund and John Jory, LLC, a construction company. The Board of Trustees of the Construction Industry and Laborers Joint Pension Trust sued the company, claiming it violated ERISA (Employee Retirement Income Security Act) rules. These violations likely involved the company failing to properly contribute to workers' pension funds or not following required procedures for handling employee benefits. Unfortunately, the court records show this case had an "unresolvable" outcome, meaning the dispute was not fully settled through the court system. This could mean the case was dismissed, settled privately, or resolved through other means outside of court. No specific damages were reported in the available records. **What This Means for Workers:** This case highlights the ongoing challenges workers face in ensuring their employers properly fund their retirement benefits. Even when pension fund trustees take legal action against companies that may not be meeting their obligations, cases don't always result in clear court victories. Workers should stay informed about their pension contributions and work with their unions or benefits administrators to monitor whether employers are meeting their retirement funding obligations.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.