Skip to main content

Baizan Guerrero v. 79th Street Gourmet & Deli Inc.

E.D.N.Y.October 3, 2019No. 1:18-cv-04761
Plaintiff Win79th Street Gourmet & Deli Inc.$93,494 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
710 Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
default judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

Plaintiff obtained default judgment against defendants for Fair Labor Standards Act violations, including unpaid minimum wages, overtime wages, spread-of-hours compensation, statutory damages, and liquidated damages totaling $93,494.00 plus interest and attorneys' fees.

What This Ruling Means

Court Rules in Favor of Worker in Wage Theft Case

What Happened

Baizan Guerrero filed a lawsuit against 79th Street Gourmet & Deli Inc., claiming the restaurant failed to pay him properly. Specifically, Guerrero alleged that the employer violated federal wage laws by not paying minimum wage, failing to pay overtime, and not properly compensating him for irregular work schedules.

The Court's Decision

The court sided completely with Guerrero. The judge found the employer violated federal labor laws and ordered the company to pay $93,494 in damages. This amount covered unpaid wages, overtime pay, compensation for work spread across odd hours, and additional penalties. The employer must also pay interest on these amounts and cover Guerrero's attorney fees.

Why This Matters

This case shows that workers have legal protection against wage theft. Employers must pay at least minimum wage and overtime as required by federal law. Workers who believe they're being underpaid can take legal action and potentially recover significant compensation. The court awarded extra damages beyond just back pay, which serves as a penalty for employer violations and discourages similar misconduct.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.