Khan v. Nyrene, Inc.
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- default judgment
- State
- New York
- Circuit
- Second Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
Plaintiff Khan prevailed on his Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Labor Law claims. The court granted his motion for default judgment and entered judgment against defendants in the amount of $13,761.69.
What This Ruling Means
Khan v. Nyrene, Inc. - Plain English Summary
What Happened
Farid Khan worked for Nyrene, Inc. and claimed the company did not pay him the wages he had earned. This is known as wage theft. Khan filed a lawsuit against his employer, accusing them of violating both federal pay laws and New York state pay laws.
What the Court Decided
The court sided with Khan completely. Because the company failed to properly respond to the lawsuit, the judge entered a default judgment in Khan's favor. This means the court found Khan's claims valid and ordered Nyrene, Inc. to pay him $13,761.69 in damages—money to compensate him for the wages he did not receive.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case shows that courts take wage theft seriously and will hold employers accountable. Workers who believe they haven't been paid fairly have legal protections under both federal and state law. If an employer doesn't respond properly to a wage claim, courts may automatically rule in the worker's favor. If you think you're owed unpaid wages, you have legal options to recover what you've earned.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.