Rosario v. EMZ Solutions LLC
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- settlement
- State
- New York
- Circuit
- Second Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The court approved a class and collective action settlement under the FLSA and New York Labor Law in which defendants agreed to pay $200,000 to approximately 100 construction workers for wage and overtime violations related to a time-rounding policy. Named plaintiffs each received $10,000 service awards, and plaintiff's counsel received $66,666 in attorneys' fees.
What This Ruling Means
Rosario v. EMZ Solutions LLC: Settlement Overview
What Happened
Construction workers employed by EMZ Solutions LLC sued the company for improperly handling their pay. The workers claimed the company used a "time-rounding policy" that cheated them out of wages and overtime pay they had earned.
What the Court Decided
The court approved a settlement agreement in which EMZ Solutions LLC agreed to pay $200,000 to resolve the dispute. Approximately 100 construction workers shared this payment. The three workers who brought the case received $10,000 each as additional compensation for their effort in pursuing the lawsuit.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case demonstrates that workers can successfully challenge wage theft through the courts. When employers use practices like time-rounding to reduce worker pay, employees can band together as a group and hold companies accountable. The settlement shows that courts take wage violations seriously and will require employers to compensate workers for unpaid earnings. If you believe your employer has improperly calculated your pay or withheld overtime, you may have similar legal protections.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.