Skip to main content

Trustees of Local 138 Pension Trust Fund v. Intercounty Paving Associates LLC

E.D.N.Y.March 18, 2021No. 2:19-cv-03106
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court's order upholding the Social Security Commissioner's denial of disability benefits. The court found no apparent conflict between the vocational expert's testimony and the Dictionary of Occupational Titles regarding the claimant's functional capacity.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened:** This case involved a dispute between a union pension fund (Local 138 Pension Trust Fund) and a paving company (Intercounty Paving Associates LLC). The pension fund trustees sued the company, likely over unpaid contributions to employee pension benefits that the employer was required to make under a union contract or legal obligation. **What the Court Decided:** The court ruled in favor of Intercounty Paving Associates, meaning the company won the case. The pension fund did not receive any monetary damages, suggesting the court found that the company either did not owe the claimed pension contributions or had valid reasons for not paying them. **Why This Matters for Workers:** This ruling highlights the ongoing challenges workers face in ensuring their pension benefits are properly funded by employers. When companies successfully defend against pension fund claims, it can potentially impact the security of workers' retirement benefits. However, each case depends on specific facts and circumstances. Workers should stay informed about their pension fund's financial health and ensure their employers are meeting their contribution obligations. If workers suspect their employer isn't properly contributing to their pension, they should contact their union representatives or pension fund administrators for clarification.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.