Atsas v. Law Office of Alex Antzoulatos
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- 710 Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- default judgment
- State
- New York
- Circuit
- Second Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
Plaintiffs prevailed on default judgment against law office defendant for wage violations under FLSA and New York Labor Law. Court awarded unpaid wages, liquidated damages, and attorneys' fees totaling approximately $109,510.80 (pending pre-judgment interest determination).
What This Ruling Means
Atsas v. Law Office of Alex Antzoulatos
What Happened
An employee named Atsas sued the Law Office of Alex Antzoulatos, claiming the employer failed to pay wages owed. The case involved violations of both federal wage laws (the Fair Labor Standards Act) and New York state labor laws designed to protect workers' pay.
What the Court Decided
The court ruled in favor of the employee. Because the law office did not respond to the lawsuit, the judge entered a default judgment against the employer. The court ordered the law office to pay approximately $109,511 in total damages. This included the unpaid wages themselves, plus an equal amount in additional damages (called liquidated damages) meant to penalize the violation, along with attorney's fees the employee incurred fighting the case.
Why This Matters for Workers
This ruling reinforces that employers cannot ignore wage theft claims. Courts take unpaid wages seriously and will award significant penalties when employers violate pay laws. Workers who believe they're owed wages have legal protections and can recover not just missing pay, but additional compensation and legal costs.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.