Skip to main content

Olivieri v. Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated

E.D.N.Y.March 28, 2022No. 2:21-cv-00046
Plaintiff WinStifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated$3,066 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
442 Civil Rights: Jobs
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

Post Modern obtained a default judgment against Andrea C. Wood for breach of contract, recovering $3,066. The appellate court affirmed the judgment, rejecting Post Modern's appeal seeking an additional $366,432 and specific performance.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** This case involved a contract dispute between an employee (Olivieri) and Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, a financial services firm. The employee sued the company for breaking their employment contract, claiming the company failed to meet its obligations under their agreement. **What the Court Decided** The court ruled in favor of the employee, finding that Stifel had indeed breached the employment contract. The company was ordered to pay $3,066 in damages to compensate the employee for the contract violation. The court rejected the company's attempts to avoid responsibility for the breach. **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling demonstrates that employment contracts are legally binding agreements that courts will enforce. When employers break the terms of an employment contract, workers have the right to seek compensation through the legal system. While the damages awarded in this case were relatively modest, the decision reinforces that employees can hold their employers accountable when contracts are violated. Workers should keep copies of their employment agreements and understand that these documents create real legal obligations that both sides must follow.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.