No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Plaintiff Alex Saltos obtained default judgment against GGI Construction Corp. and Ivan Campos for violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act and New York wage-and-hour laws. The court awarded compensatory damages, liquidated damages, statutory damages, and prejudgment interest totaling $19,712.35.
Saltos v. GGI Construction Corp: Worker Files Wage Violation Lawsuit
This case involved a worker named Saltos who sued GGI Construction Corp, claiming the company violated federal wage laws. Saltos filed the lawsuit in federal court in New York's Eastern District in August 2022, alleging that GGI Construction violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The FLSA is the federal law that sets minimum wage requirements and overtime pay rules for most workers.
Unfortunately, the court's final decision and case outcome are not available in the public records. No damage amounts have been reported, which could mean the case is still ongoing, was settled privately, or was dismissed.
What This Means for Workers:
Even without knowing the final outcome, this case highlights an important right that workers have. The Fair Labor Standards Act allows employees to sue their employers when they believe they haven't been paid properly. This includes situations where workers don't receive minimum wage or overtime pay when they work more than 40 hours per week. Construction workers, like those at GGI Construction, are generally covered by these federal wage protections and can take legal action if their employers fail to pay them correctly.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.