Skip to main content

De Figueroa v. New York State, State University of New York at Stony Brook

E.D.N.Y.September 8, 2022No. 2:17-cv-00436
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Civil Rights: Jobs
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

RetaliationDiscrimination

Outcome

Summary judgment granted for defendants on all remaining claims. Plaintiff failed to establish that defendants' legitimate reasons for denying the 2015 raise were pretextual, and the 2016 bonus was denied before the lawsuit was filed, eliminating retaliation basis.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** An employee named De Figueroa filed a discrimination lawsuit against the State University of New York at Stony Brook in 2022. The employee claimed the university violated their civil rights in the workplace, alleging employment discrimination occurred during their time working there. **What the Court Decided** The federal court dismissed the case entirely. The judge ruled that De Figueroa failed to provide enough specific details in their lawsuit paperwork to support a valid discrimination claim. Essentially, the court found that the complaint didn't include sufficient facts to show that illegal discrimination actually took place. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case highlights how important it is to be thorough and specific when filing discrimination complaints. Workers who believe they've experienced workplace discrimination must provide detailed information about what happened, when it occurred, and how it relates to their protected characteristics (like race, gender, age, etc.). Simply stating that discrimination occurred isn't enough - employees need to include concrete examples and facts that support their claims. Workers considering legal action should document incidents carefully and consider consulting with an employment attorney to ensure their complaints meet legal requirements.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.