Skip to main content

Sudilovskiy v. City WAV Corp.

E.D.N.Y.September 29, 2022No. 1:22-cv-00469
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
710 Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

Plaintiffs' motion for default judgment was denied without prejudice. The court identified multiple procedural deficiencies, including failure to comply with Local Civil Rule 55.2 (service and proposed judgment form), insufficient Servicemembers Civil Relief Act affidavit, and failure to establish the amount of damages with sufficient specificity. Plaintiffs were afforded leave to amend their pleading and cure service defects.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** Sudilovskiy filed a lawsuit against City WAV Corp. over wage and hour violations. The employee claimed the company failed to pay proper wages under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which is the federal law that sets minimum wage and overtime requirements. This type of case is commonly known as a wage theft claim, where workers argue their employer didn't pay them what they were legally owed. **What the Court Decided** Based on the available information, the final outcome of this case is not yet determined or publicly available. The case was filed in federal court in New York's Eastern District in September 2022, but the court's decision has not been reported. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case represents the type of legal action workers can take when they believe their employer has violated wage and hour laws. The Fair Labor Standards Act protects employees' rights to receive minimum wage and overtime pay for hours worked over 40 per week. Workers who suspect wage theft can file complaints with the Department of Labor or pursue lawsuits in federal court to recover unpaid wages, though outcomes vary case by case.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.