Skip to main content

Mendoza v. A.P.P.I. Management Corp.

E.D.N.Y.July 11, 2023No. 2:22-cv-02179
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
consent decree

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

Plaintiff Elvis Mendoza settled his Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Labor Law wage-and-hour claims against A.P.P.I. Management Corp. and individual defendants for $25,000, representing approximately 32% of his claimed damages of $77,624.42. The court approved the settlement as a reasonable compromise of contested wage-and-hour issues.

What This Ruling Means

**Mendoza v. A.P.P.I. Management Corp. - Employment Law Case Summary** **What Happened:** A worker named Mendoza filed a lawsuit against A.P.P.I. Management Corp. in federal court, claiming the company violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The FLSA is the federal law that sets rules for minimum wage, overtime pay, and other workplace standards. While the specific details of Mendoza's complaint aren't available, FLSA cases typically involve disputes over unpaid wages, overtime violations, or other compensation issues. **What the Court Decided:** The outcome of this case is not yet known, as the court filing from July 2023 appears to be from early in the legal process. No damages have been reported, which suggests the case may still be ongoing or was resolved without a public monetary award. **Why This Matters for Workers:** Even without knowing the final outcome, this case highlights workers' rights under federal law to fair pay and proper compensation. The FLSA gives employees the right to challenge employers in court when they believe their wages or working conditions violate federal standards. Workers should know they have legal protections and can seek help if they suspect wage violations at their workplace.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.