No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Plaintiff prevailed on default judgment against defendant for FLSA and New York Labor Law violations, awarded $71,779.08 in unpaid wages, liquidated damages, and wage-statement violations, plus $8,606.25 in attorney's fees and $467 in costs.
Perez Arguello v. Lojan: Fair Labor Standards Act Case
This case involved a worker named Perez Arguello who sued their employer, Lojan, claiming violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The FLSA is the federal law that sets rules for minimum wage, overtime pay, and other workplace standards. While the specific details of what Arguello claimed aren't provided, FLSA violations typically involve issues like unpaid wages, denied overtime, or misclassification of workers.
The court case was filed in September 2023 in the Eastern District of New York. However, the available information doesn't provide enough detail to determine how the court ultimately decided this case or what the final outcome was for either party.
What This Means for Workers:
Even without knowing the specific outcome, this case highlights that workers have the right to file lawsuits when they believe their employer has violated wage and hour laws. The Fair Labor Standards Act gives employees important protections, and workers can take legal action if they're not paid properly. If you believe your employer isn't following wage and hour laws, you may have options to seek help through legal channels.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.