Skip to main content

International Union of Painters & Allied Trades, District Council No. 4 v. Hosek Contractors, Inc.

N.D.N.Y.June 15, 2020No. 5:19-cv-01406
Plaintiff WinHosek Contractors, Inc.$10,526.75 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
default judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

Plaintiffs obtained a default judgment against defendants for failure to respond to the complaint, establishing liability for unpaid employee fringe benefit contributions under ERISA and the collective bargaining agreement.

What This Ruling Means

**Union Wins Case Against Contractor for Unpaid Benefits** This case involved a dispute between a painters' union and Hosek Contractors over unpaid employee benefit contributions. The International Union of Painters & Allied Trades sued the construction company, claiming it failed to pay required contributions to employee benefit funds as required by their collective bargaining agreement. The court ruled in favor of the union after Hosek Contractors failed to respond to the lawsuit or appear in court. Because the company didn't defend itself, the judge issued a "default judgment," automatically finding the contractor liable for the unpaid contributions. The court ordered Hosek Contractors to pay $10,526.75 in damages to cover the missing benefit fund payments. This decision matters for workers because it demonstrates that employers must honor their contractual obligations to pay into employee benefit funds, even after a project ends or if they're facing financial difficulties. When companies try to avoid these responsibilities by ignoring lawsuits, courts will still hold them accountable. Union members can take legal action to recover unpaid contributions that fund their health insurance, pensions, and other benefits. The ruling reinforces that collective bargaining agreements are legally binding contracts that protect workers' earned benefits.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.