Skip to main content

McArdle-Bracelin v. Embassy Suites Employer LLC

N.D.N.Y.February 17, 2022No. 1:20-cv-00861
Defendant WinEmbassy Suites Franchise LLC; Hilton Franchise Holding LLC; Congress Hotel LLC; Veeder Hospitality Management LLC
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Other
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage TheftWrongful Termination

Outcome

Court issued a Decision & Order on defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings. The full ruling on the motion's outcome is not provided in the excerpt.

Browse more:Wage Theft casesWrongful Termination cases

Similar Rulings

Con Ed v. NLRB
U.S. Supreme CourtDec 1938
Mixed Result
Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
U.S. Supreme CourtFeb 1951
Remanded
Republic Aviation Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
U.S. Supreme CourtApr 1945
Plaintiff Win
Mastro Plastics Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
U.S. Supreme CourtJun 1956
Plaintiff Win
Dr. N. Jay ROGERS Et Al., Petitioners-Appellees, v. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Respondent-Appellant
5th CircuitJan 1972
Plaintiff Win
Read Full OpinionAll Rulings

Browse Related

More rulings from New YorkMore wage theft casesMore hospitality & food service employer cases

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

Check My RightsLearn the Basics

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.