Reinoso v. Downtown Restaurant Company LLC
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- 710 Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- consent decree
- State
- New York
- Circuit
- Second Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The Court approved a settlement of $33,000 in a Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Labor Law wage-and-hour case, with $22,000 allocated to the two plaintiff employees and $11,000 reserved for attorneys' fees and costs.
What This Ruling Means
Reinoso v. Downtown Restaurant Company LLC
What Happened
Two employees sued Downtown Restaurant Company LLC, claiming the restaurant violated federal and New York wage laws by not properly paying them for their work. The lawsuit alleged the employer engaged in wage theft—keeping money that employees had earned.
What the Court Decided
The court approved a settlement requiring the restaurant to pay $33,000 to resolve the case. Of this amount, $22,000 went directly to the two employees who filed the lawsuit, while $11,000 covered legal fees and court costs.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case demonstrates that employees have legal protections against wage theft. When employers fail to pay workers what they've earned, workers can take legal action and potentially recover their lost wages. The settlement shows courts take wage-and-hour violations seriously. If you believe your employer has underpaid you or violated pay laws, you may have the right to file a claim and recover damages—and the company may have to cover your legal costs.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.