Skip to main content

The Independence Project, Inc. v. Ventresca Bros. Construction Co., Inc.

S.D.N.Y.August 30, 2019No. 7:18-cv-02748
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

Plaintiff The Independence Project, Inc. won its case for a real estate commission against Ventresca Bros. Construction Co., Inc. The court affirmed the trial court's judgment that defendant was liable for the 6% commission on a property sale completed during the listing agreement period, regardless of whether plaintiff procured the purchaser.

What This Ruling Means

**Real Estate Commission Dispute Results in Win for Broker** This case involved a dispute over unpaid real estate commissions between The Independence Project, a real estate company, and Ventresca Bros. Construction Company. The Independence Project had a listing agreement to sell property owned by Ventresca Bros., which entitled them to a 6% commission on any sale that occurred during the agreement period. When the property was sold during this time, Ventresca Bros. refused to pay the commission, arguing that The Independence Project didn't actually find the buyer. The court ruled in favor of The Independence Project, ordering Ventresca Bros. to pay the full 6% commission. The judge determined that under the terms of their agreement, the real estate company was entitled to payment regardless of whether they personally found the purchaser, as long as the sale happened while their listing agreement was active. **What this means for workers:** This ruling reinforces that written contracts must be honored as agreed. When businesses sign agreements with specific payment terms, they cannot later refuse payment by claiming the work wasn't performed exactly as they preferred, if the contract terms were actually met. Workers should ensure their contracts clearly spell out when and how they'll be paid.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.